ARU angered by IRB's Horwill appeal

Furious Australian rugby chiefs came out fighting on behalf of Wallabies captain James Horwill on Thursday amid fears that he could miss next week's third Test showdown against the British and Irish Lions in Sydney.

Horwill was cleared at a judicial hearing last weekend after being cited for stamping on Lions lock Alun-Wyn Jones during Australia's 23-21 first Test defeat in Brisbane. The International Rugby Board has now intervened, though, and appealed that decision in an unprecedented move following a not guilty verdict.

Although 28-year-old Horwill can play in Saturday's second Test, he must then await the outcome of an appeal hearing to be chaired by Canadian Graeme Mew after this weekend's game.

Australian Rugby Union chief executive Bill Pulver said in a statement: "This is an unprecedented step taken by the IRB in what is the most important rugby event staged in Australia since the 2003 Rugby World Cup.

"While we respect the right of the IRB to intervene, we also respect the knowledge and experience of appointed - and independent - judicial officers, and their expertise to consider evidence and reach sound findings.

"James Horwill was cleared of the stamping charge as per the IRB's established judicial process. We are surprised and disappointed that the finding of Mr Hampton (judicial officer) is now not only under question, but deemed to be 'erroneous'.

"In the midst of an extraordinarily successful series that has been 12 years in the making, the re-hearing process - not even taking into consideration the possible outcomes - has the potential to cause serious disruption to the Wallabies and the positive atmosphere surrounding the tour.

"The ARU in no way condones foul play. However, the process was followed according to IRB regulations and the decision of an independent judicial officer handed down. What has occurred subsequently is without precedent."

In a statement, the IRB said: "As the 2013 Lions tour falls within the scope of the IRB merit-based appointment scheme approved by the IRB Council, the IRB has the right to appeal any decision arising from matches under the scheme.

"Furthermore, given its duty to preserve player welfare at all levels of the game, the IRB is compelled to further examine potential acts of foul play which either potentially or in reality impact on the preservation of player welfare. It is important for the IRB to ensure amongst all stakeholders in the game that there is full confidence that priority is given to player welfare and the values of the game."

< Back
Reddit Facebook Digg Del.icio.us Twitter Bebo

Latest News

Latest Sport

Today's Features